Borrowings and plagiarism

Primary peer review is carried out by the editorial staff of the journal, in case of incorrect design of the article or non-compliance with the criteria, the journal will return the article to the author. При прозитивнем решении проверка работы na plagiat (Information system "Antiplagiat.VUZ" (License), threshold level 75%). An article that has not passed the review is returned for revision and cannot be considered for inclusion in the current issue of the journal. Work with originality above 75% is then checked by one or several reviewers (possible check of English grammar, etc.). If necessary, the author makes corrections based on the reviewers' recommendations. The editorial office adheres to the principle of Double-blind review, double-blind - anonymity of the author and the reviewer. The secondary process of review is review of the article by the editor-in-chief and acceptance for publication.

Artificial Intelligence Usage Rules

The permissible use of artificial intelligence tools in the preparation of an article is up to 10%. Articles in which AI accounts for between 11% and 15% require revision, whilst articles in which AI accounts for more than 16% will not be considered and will be rejected.

Permitted uses of AI include: data processing and analysis, searching for and organising information, editing text without altering the substance of the scientific content, visualising information, and formatting the article.

It is not permitted to use AI to develop the main scientific idea or conclusions, to substitute the author’s own analysis and research, or to generate text that replaces the author’s own writing of sections of the article.